Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

:dance:
 
©2009 ~Ceryk
:iconceryk:

Artist's Comments

I've recently bought a jewelry related CAD program. This is the result of the first thing I've finished with it. Just trying to figure out the program and all of that, so just went with something simple. Added a bit of decoration to the sides to make it a little more interesting than just a channel and that's it.

It is, however, essentially fully finished. There are seats cut for the gems. I mostly did that to see how it would work. My guess is that for a channel setting application, such as this, that really serves mostly for placement. The bottom of the channel will definitely need to be recut if I ever had it milled out, otherwise the stones won't fit. I could probably cut it in the program so the machine makes it correctly, but as I said. I'm trying to figure things out and I'm happy to have done this.

The rendering software it uses has been a little tricky. It's difficult to navigate in and it's going to take some more tweaking to find the best settings. Can't do much about the textures, got to use what they have. Once I started tweaking the ray-tracing and lighting, things got better. Small diamonds don't seem to show up well (these would be 2mm stones), so I went with sapphires. But I'm happy with the way the render came out.

For my first real attempt at anything with a program I don't know well, I'm pretty happy with it. I'm tempted to have it milled simply because it's the first piece I've done for CAD/CAM application :P

Comments


love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icondans-magic:
Wow, very beautiful rendering. I love the design.

--
Like exotic and unusual jewelery??
:iconceryk:
Really? All I did was make a plain channel with a few rounded accents on the sides, lol. Thanks. Still learning the program and all. I can't wait to actually get some of the stuff milled and cast them. Would be nice if I could do some I'm planning by hand, but I'm not very good at carving :\ Plus I've got a real thing about absolute symmetry for symmetrical stuff :p
:icondans-magic:
Yeah, a rotary carver and a millimeter gauge (caliper) are key for symmetry. I bet you could do it! Just takes practice.

But yeah I love the design, sometimes simple is best

--
Like exotic and unusual jewelery??
:iconseeker212121:
Great job on this first design. It's the little details like the indented sides that make it different from what is out there. The CAD makes it so much easier to lay out an eternity band, the formula for laying one out by hand is a booger bear!

--
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.
Anne Lamont
:iconceryk:
Seriously. And Pave. I'm still messing with that one though. I've gotten it to work nicely for with a square layout so far. But I don't think the Triangle layout worked because I wanted to keep the stones a uniform size. And since only diamonds seem to come in odd sizes like 1.285. I don't like diamonds to begin with and I can't afford to do that unless someone else is buying.
:iconseeker212121:
You'll never get a triangle layout with uniform diamond sizes, you'll always have to fudge sizes somewhere. My husband and I were discussing this just yesterday, how difficult certain shapes are to layout consistently and if someone could figure out the algorithms to do this they could make a fortune as it would be useful in other industries also.
Coming up with enough stones that don't vary more than 1/10th of a mm from largest to smallest is also a big pain, I order half again as much as I need to do real pave' so I can get the correct size. Leveridge-ing 500+, 1.00mm stones is really tiring!
My husband did an Italian Horn in pave' and it required a map to finish right.

--
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.
Anne Lamont
:iconceryk:
I honestly hate Pave. I mean, it can look cool and all, but I really don't ever want to do it without uniform stone sizes and pre-made holes and prongs.

But I almost got the triangle layout to work. Technically, it DID work, but I didn't like what happened. I've got this D-Pad idea I'm playing with, think of it as a cross with all 4 arms the same size. So I try to put the Pave in the center and the north and south arms work perfectly. The east and west, however, have this wavy edge action going on where the N/S ones are perfectly straight. I think if I close the center to avoid the pave going there and do it a little differently, it would come out perfectly. Maybe just make one arm and make copies or something. But setting it up required pretty precise measurements and it was a flat surface. And, of course, it was in the CAD program :p
:iconseeker212121:
Pave' is a bitch, but it's a profitable bitch. Each arm would have to be laid out independently but the center will always be a problem as I understand the program. Pave' has some serious limitations on it but a well executed piece is fabulous to see.

--
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.
Anne Lamont
:iconceryk:
Yeah, I think I'd have to do the arms seperately and throw a large stone in the center or something. Bu I've got a lot of ideas to play with with just this single idea :p

Details

June 25
80.4 KB
80.4 KB
787×456

Statistics

10
5 [who?]
129 (1 today)
9 (0 today)

Share

Link
Embed
Thumb

Site Map